Benefits, co-benefits, and trade-offs in natural water retention measures: a review of classifications and indicators

Parisa Almasi (), Francesco Pagliacci, Francesco Bettella, Lucia Bortolini and Vincenzo D’Agostino
Additional contact information
Parisa Almasi: Department of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry, University of Padova
Francesco Pagliacci: Department of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry, University of Padova
Francesco Bettella: Department of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry, University of Padova
Lucia Bortolini: Department of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry, University of Padova
Vincenzo D’Agostino: Department of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry, University of Padova

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, 2025, vol. 121, issue 14, No 3, 16205-16246

Abstract: Abstract In recent years, natural hazards related to climate change, such as extreme floods, droughts and heatwaves, have increased in magnitude and frequency. In response, Natural Water Retention Measure (NWRM), as a vital strategy to mitigate these challenges, focuses on increasing and/or restoring the retention capacity of soil and aquatic ecosystems. NWRMs can have positive impacts that may lead to several benefits and co-benefits. They can also have some negative impacts, in the form of trade-offs. To assess the efficacy of NWRMs, it is essential to consider and evaluate both multiple benefits and trade-offs in a comprehensive framework and use appropriate indicators for their assessment. Through a literature review, it is found that there is no thorough study that examines the different types of benefits and co-benefits, provides a complete classification of the benefits and co-benefits of NWRMs, and introduces various indicators for their evaluation. In addition, trade-offs associated with NWRM are sometimes mentioned in the existing literature, but the different types of trade-offs are not fully listed. In this regard, and for the first time, the present study aims to provide a classification of both the positive and the negative impacts of NWRMs and a list of different indicators related to various types of benefits and/or co-benefits. The study also shows major challenges in assessing NWRMs efficacy, including the spatial and temporal scale of the data and indicators, combining qualitative indicators with quantitative indicators, trade-off quantification considering social, economic and cultural aspects, and human perception.

Keywords: Natural water retention measure; Multiple benefits; Indicators; Trade-off (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-025-07470-2 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:14:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07470-2

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11069

DOI: 10.1007/s11069-025-07470-2

Access Statistics for this article

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards is currently edited by Thomas Glade, Tad S. Murty and Vladimír Schenk

More articles in Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards from Springer, International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().