Flood susceptibility mapping of urban flood risk: comparing autoencoder multilayer perceptron and logistic regression models in Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand
Noriyasu Tsumita (),
Suwanno Piyapong (),
Ratthanaporn Kaewkluengklom (),
Sittha Jaensirisak () and
Atsushi Fukuda ()
Additional contact information
Noriyasu Tsumita: Kanazawa University
Suwanno Piyapong: Rajamangala University of Technology
Ratthanaporn Kaewkluengklom: Ubon Ratchathani University
Sittha Jaensirisak: Ubon Ratchathani University
Atsushi Fukuda: Nihon University
Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, 2025, vol. 121, issue 15, No 23, 17833-17867
Abstract:
Abstract Riverine flooding in Southeast Asian cities increasingly affects their residents, often causing prolonged negative consequences due to their geographic position in lowland areas. The rapid expansion of urban areas into highly vulnerable zones has only exacerbated this issue. To mitigate flood risk, it is crucial to assess and map flood susceptibility and for incorporation into future urban planning. This study evaluates and compares the predictive performance of logistic regression (LR) and the autoencoder multilayer perceptron (AE-MLP), an advanced model, for urban flood risk assessment in Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand. The models were assessed using an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and several indexes (accuracy, F1-score, precision, Recall). This study also mapped vulnerable populations based on estimated flood risk from each model. The AE-MLP model outperformed the LR model, achieving an AUC of 0.950 compared to 0.860. An analysis of flood risk distribution revealed that the LR model estimated 1.79% of the population residing in high-risk areas and 0.83% in very high-risk areas. In comparison, the AE-MLP model estimated 24.00 and 7.97%, respectively, demonstrating its superior sensitivity in identifying vulnerable zones. These findings indicate that the AE-MLP model can significantly improve flood risk prediction and accurately identify high-risk areas. Integrating these models into urban planning and disaster management frameworks can enhance resilience to flooding.
Keywords: Riverine flooding; Flood susceptibility mapping; Deep learning; Geographical information system (GIS); Autoencoder multilayer perceptron (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-025-07494-8 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:15:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07494-8
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11069
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-025-07494-8
Access Statistics for this article
Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards is currently edited by Thomas Glade, Tad S. Murty and Vladimír Schenk
More articles in Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards from Springer, International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().