Role of the internet of things in flood risk management: a critical review on current practices and future directions

Vahid Bakhtiari, Hamed Darabi Kerchi, Farzad Piadeh (), Kourosh Behzadian and Farnad Nasirzadeh
Additional contact information
Vahid Bakhtiari: Deakin University
Hamed Darabi Kerchi: Islamic Azad University
Farzad Piadeh: University of Hertfordshire
Kourosh Behzadian: University of West London
Farnad Nasirzadeh: Deakin University

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, 2025, vol. 121, issue 17, No 2, 19473-19505

Abstract: Abstract The Internet of Things (IoT) has become increasingly important in flood risk management (FRM). This trend emerged as climate change intensified flooding events, driving the urgent need for localised early warning systems. Previous studies demonstrated the effectiveness of IoT sensors in forecasting potential floods and supporting flood modelling. However, comprehensive research addressing all FRM stages - prevention, mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery - has remained limited. To address this research gap, this study identified five key IoT sensor categories: water quantity, water quality, rainfall intensity, weather conditions, and catchment characteristics. The roles, objectives, and applications of these sensors across FRM stages were then investigated. Results showed that water quantity sensors were the most common, accounting for 48% of documented IoT applications. Weather condition sensors (27%) and rainfall intensity sensors (21%) were also widely used, especially after 2021. Additionally, IoT-based FRM had three primary Objectives flood modelling (61%), alerting (25%), and visualisation (14%). Most cases (42%) focused on the preparedness stage, while prevention (8%) and recovery (5%) were underrepresented, highlighting clear gaps in existing research. The review also revealed several overlooked sensor types, including groundwater level, biochemical oxygen demand, and nitrite sensors. Despite their potential to enhance quality-based flood modelling, these sensors were rarely utilised. Consequently, the study emphasised the need for broader integration of IoT sensors throughout all FRM stages. Such integration could support more resilient, data-driven flood management strategies, particularly in regions where IoT deployment has remained limited.

Keywords: Early warning system; Flood modelling; Flood risk management; Flood visualisation; Internet of things; Sensors (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-025-07589-2 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:17:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07589-2

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11069

DOI: 10.1007/s11069-025-07589-2

Access Statistics for this article

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards is currently edited by Thomas Glade, Tad S. Murty and Vladimír Schenk

More articles in Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards from Springer, International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().