Identification of community assets: a survey of coastal Oregonians’ priorities for natural hazard preparedness

Andrea Y. J. Mah (), Jenna Tilt, Joshua Blockstein, Natasha Fox, Najiba Rashid, Amina E. Meselhe and Felicia N. S. Olmeta Schult
Additional contact information
Andrea Y. J. Mah: Oregon State University
Jenna Tilt: Oregon State University
Joshua Blockstein: Oregon State University
Natasha Fox: Oregon Department of Emergency Management
Najiba Rashid: Oregon State University
Amina E. Meselhe: Oregon State University
Felicia N. S. Olmeta Schult: Oregon State University

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, 2025, vol. 121, issue 18, No 24, 21385-21403

Abstract: Abstract Oregon coastal communities are exposed to numerous natural hazards including coastal erosion, sea-level rise, storms, tsunamis, which they must prepare for. Identifying assets in a community which support the various needs of a community helps to determine which places need to be protected before disasters occur, and which could be used to support disaster recovery. In the current study, we surveyed residents of coastal Oregon communities (N = 524) to identify what assets are important to community members, including which places they value, which places they believe should be protected from disasters, and the characteristics that they value in those places. Coastal residents highly valued places which provide access to nature, such as beaches and parks and built places that provided both private and public services. Natural and built places with public services were valued because survey respondents saw them as places which support their well-being, but built places with private and public services were seen as more important for their support of essential services. Respondents also identified the places that they believe should be protected before a disaster occurs, and actions they think their communities should take to mitigate disaster impacts. Participants recognized the need to protect facilities essential to health and safety such as hospitals prior to disaster, but primarily wanted places where the community gathers and which would allow for connections with the community (e.g., community centers) to be protected. Both places identified by survey respondents desired for protection against natural hazards and those that they intrinsically valued in general varied depending on demographic characteristics, highlighting the need for broad and diverse participation in planning efforts.

Keywords: Disaster resilience; Community assets; Critical facilities; Communities; Preparedness; Natural hazards; Survey (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-025-07626-0 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:18:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07626-0

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11069

DOI: 10.1007/s11069-025-07626-0

Access Statistics for this article

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards is currently edited by Thomas Glade, Tad S. Murty and Vladimír Schenk

More articles in Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards from Springer, International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().