Modelling spatiotemporal patterns of wildfire risk in the Garden Route District biodiversity hotspots using analytic hierarchy process in South Africa

Phindile Siyasanga Shinga, Solomon G. Tesfamichael, Phila Sibandze, Ahmed Mukalazi Kalumba and Gbenga Abayomi Afuye ()
Additional contact information
Phindile Siyasanga Shinga: University of Fort Hare
Solomon G. Tesfamichael: University of Johannesburg
Phila Sibandze: Université Côte d’Azur
Ahmed Mukalazi Kalumba: University of Fort Hare
Gbenga Abayomi Afuye: University of Fort Hare

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, 2025, vol. 121, issue 2, No 32, 1945-1969

Abstract: Abstract The increasing frequency and intensity of wildfires necessitate effective risk management in biodiversity hotspots to mitigate the potential impacts of wildfire hazards. The study utilised a multi-criteria decision analysis-analytic hierarchy process (MCDA-AHP) model to analyse wildfire risk patterns in the Garden Route District (GRD), focusing on biodiversity hotspots in the Western Cape, South Africa. The study used weight assignment and overlay analysis to evaluate wildfire risk factors, including human, topographic, and climatic factors, using data from Landsat and WorldClim from 1991 to 2021. The wildfire risk model was validated using MODIS historical fire data from the Global Forest Watch database and Confusion Matrix, with the burned area extent identified using differenced Normalized Burn Ratio (dNBR). The results show that despite 53% of the most burned area, only 12% was burned, with the high-risk zone accounting for only 11%, indicating a higher likelihood of wildfires spreading and intensifying. The results reveal a weak positive correlation (r = 0.28) between historical fire occurrences and burned areas and a negative correlation (r = − 0.27) between historical fire occurrences and fire seasons. Human and climatic factors significantly impact wildfire propagation in high-risk zones, while topographic factors have less influence, indicating a lower risk of ignition. The findings show that 26% of high-risk zones in the southwestern region dominated GRD biodiversity hotspots, while 27% were in the low-moderate-risk zone in the northwestern parts. The results of this study can aid in assigning fire risk-based criterion weights to support decision-makers in regional and global wildfire prevention and management.

Keywords: Burned area; Historical fire occurrences; MCDA-AHP; Wildfire behaviour factors; Wildfire risk zones (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-024-06877-7 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-024-06877-7

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11069

DOI: 10.1007/s11069-024-06877-7

Access Statistics for this article

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards is currently edited by Thomas Glade, Tad S. Murty and Vladimír Schenk

More articles in Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards from Springer, International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().