EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Liquefaction susceptibility prediction using ML-based voting ensemble classifier

Vaishnavi Bherde (), Nethish Gorantala () and Umashankar Balunaini ()
Additional contact information
Vaishnavi Bherde: Indian Institute of Technology
Nethish Gorantala: Indian Institute of Technology
Umashankar Balunaini: Indian Institute of Technology

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, 2025, vol. 121, issue 4, No 27, 4359-4384

Abstract: Abstract An accurate assessment of soil liquefaction susceptibility is critical in the design of earthquake-resistant structures. A large dataset consisting of 749 field cone penetration test (CPT) and standard penetration test (SPT) results is integrated into an ensemble of machine learning (ML) models. This study presents a novel approach for predicting liquefaction susceptibility using the voting ensemble-based ML model. This ensemble architecture considered in the study combines different classification algorithms, viz., logistic regression (LoR), decision tree classifier (DTC), random forest classifier (RFC), XGBoost classifier (XGBC), and gradient boosting model (GBC). Among the different ML models examined, the RFC is found to be the most reliable prediction tool. However, individual ensemble models are prone to overfitting; hence, voting ensemble models are considered to improve prediction accuracy. Out of 62 possible combinations, a voting ensemble consisting of LoR, XGBC, and GBC is found to be the best-performing model. Based on the sensitivity analysis carried out using the best-performing voting ensemble, the penetration resistance is found to significantly influence the model performance, followed by peak ground acceleration. Additionally, a separate analysis performed on 250 data points of individual field tests (i.e., CPT and SPT) showed that ML models fed on the CPT dataset provide better accuracy compared to the SPT dataset. Finally, the accuracy of the proposed voting ensemble model is compared with the traditional approach used to perform liquefaction susceptibility. The findings of this study hold significant implications for liquefaction susceptibility prediction, implying that the CPT data available at a given site can enhance decision-making and design processes using the proposed ML models.

Keywords: Liquefaction susceptibility; Voting ensemble; Cone penetration test; Sensitivity analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-024-06960-z Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s11069-024-06960-z

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11069

DOI: 10.1007/s11069-024-06960-z

Access Statistics for this article

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards is currently edited by Thomas Glade, Tad S. Murty and Vladimír Schenk

More articles in Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards from Springer, International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-05
Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s11069-024-06960-z