Federal Legislation for Disaster Mitigation: A Comparative Assessment Between Canada and the United States

John Newton

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, 1997, vol. 16, issue 2, 219-241

Abstract: Exposure to natural hazards tends to be poorly understood and yet implicitly accepted by a large proportion of populations at risk. Some people through years of experience and time-tested coping mechanisms effectively respond to most hazards. Others, lacking skills and experience, are dependent on institutional response systems for immediate assistance and long-term recovery. Clearly, both approaches can reduce losses; however, the former strategies often prove more cost effective. How then, can loss reduction be handled with minimal external involvement? Are there not strategies that can reduce the impact of natural hazards and minimize exposure to these risks? Introduction of hazard mitigation strategies can begin to address these concerns in a timely and cost effective manner. Federal institutions in Canada and the United States recognize this potential, and in response, have developed policies and designed programs to limit the impact of hazards. To further collective thinking on hazard mitigation, this paper surveys current legislation and programs in both countries, makes a comparative assessment, and seeks to identify implications for mitigation policy within the framework of the Canadian IDNDR initiative. Perceptions of mitigation are explored to create a common foundation from which to address the nature, direction, and structure of mitigation policy and programs in Canada. Clarity of purpose, awareness of context, and acknowledgment of limitations and conflicts represent crucial aspects in the evolution of mitigation strategies. Through awareness, understanding, and a willingness to engage in dialogue new ways of thinking can be employed to decrease the impact of natural hazards on society and the environment. Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Keywords: hazard mitigation; federal emergency legislation; mitigation policy; mitigation programs; emergency management; IDNDR (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1997
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1023/A:1007976800302 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:16:y:1997:i:2:p:219-241

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11069

DOI: 10.1023/A:1007976800302

Access Statistics for this article

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards is currently edited by Thomas Glade, Tad S. Murty and Vladimír Schenk

More articles in Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards from Springer, International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().