EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Disaster Mitigation vis-á-vis Time of Occurrence and Magnitude of Earthquakes in India

H. Srivastava and G. Gupta

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, 2004, vol. 31, issue 2, 343-356

Abstract: Earthquakes occurring during the night or early morning hours cause a heavy loss of life. Also, an earthquake occurring in the late evening hours poses serious handicap for disaster mitigation efforts due to failure of electricity and blocking of roads due to fall of debris. The larger aftershocks may cause further damage depending upon the magnitude of the main earthquakes of magnitude 5.5 and more in the Indian region. Out of 7 great earthquakes (M >7.8) in the Indian region during the last 200 years, five (1819, 1897, 1905, 1941 and 1950) have occurred during the evening or early morning hours. About 67% of all the earthquakes of magnitude >7.0 show similar result. It is found that in general, the percentage of earthquakes occurring during evening/early morning is larger than that during the daytime. However, the difference in time of occurrence is not significant at 95% level of confidence using χ 2 test. Keeping in view that most of the earthquakes in India of magnitude more than 6 have caused significant damage in the last decade (Uttarkashi, 1991; Latur, 1993; Jabalpur, 1997; Chamoli, 1999) and have occurred in the night/ early morning, disaster management plans need to be designed for awareness and education separately for the night and day times. The limitations of the seismic zoning map with reference to the earthquakes in Koyna (1967) and Latur (1993) have suggested to safeguard the life and property of the Indian population from the effects of future damaging earthquakes which should be failsafe instead of following the code and then introduce further changes in the code. It is suggested that residential houses (including tall structures) should be built for a design earthquake of magnitude 6.0 in all the three seismic zones namely I, II and III demarcated by the Bureau of Indian Standards giving proper weight age to site response. However, for Zones IV and V usual code recommendations may be followed through micro zoning of important, densely populated or most vulnerable areas. Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Keywords: Earthquakes; time of occurrence; largest aftershocks; disaster mitigation; design magnitude (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1023/B:NHAZ.0000023356.00213.5e (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:31:y:2004:i:2:p:343-356

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11069

DOI: 10.1023/B:NHAZ.0000023356.00213.5e

Access Statistics for this article

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards is currently edited by Thomas Glade, Tad S. Murty and Vladimír Schenk

More articles in Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards from Springer, International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:31:y:2004:i:2:p:343-356