Evaluation of the environmental impacts of extreme floods in the Evros River basin using Contingent Valuation Method

V. Markantonis (), V. Meyer and N. Lienhoop

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, 2013, vol. 69, issue 3, 1535-1549

Abstract: The current practice of flood risk assessment focuses mainly on damages that can be easily measured in monetary terms, i.e. the so-called tangible damages on assets that have market values. However, quite often flood events are causing damages on assets that have no market values, e.g. environmental impacts, which usually are neglected. In this context, the present paper explores the potential of Contingent Valuation Method (CVM) to estimate the environmental costs of floods. CVM is a method widely used in environmental economics valuating environmental goods and services that have no market prices. In this case, it is applied to estimate the environmental costs of the severe flooding event that emerged in the Evros River (Greece) during March/April 2006. The environmental costs are elicited by asking three groups of local stakeholders (local scientific and administration experts, farmers and hunters) for their willingness to pay (WTP) to avoid such impacts, particularly on the soil, the biodiversity and the aesthetic environment. Additionally, the experts are asked to state in their opinion, which part of the regional gross domestic product (GDP) should be allocated to avoid environmental flood impacts in the Evros River. The opinions of the three local stakeholders groups were considered in the survey since they are the most informed parts of the population on such a complex issue. Consequently, both the WTP and GDP estimations do not represent the preferences of the wider local population. The findings of this valuation approach have the potential to contribute to a more comprehensive assessment and thus to a more unbiased flood risk management. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Keywords: Flood risk management; Contingent valuation; Environmental impacts; Cost assessment; Stakeholders (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (14)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11069-013-0762-3 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:69:y:2013:i:3:p:1535-1549

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11069

DOI: 10.1007/s11069-013-0762-3

Access Statistics for this article

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards is currently edited by Thomas Glade, Tad S. Murty and Vladimír Schenk

More articles in Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards from Springer, International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().