A geospatial approach to assessing soil erosion in a watershed by integrating socio-economic determinants and the RUSLE model

Krishna Bhandari (), Jagannath Aryal () and Rotchanatch Darnsawasdi ()

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, 2015, vol. 75, issue 1, 342 pages

Abstract: The amount, degree of severity, and risk of soil erosion in managed landscapes mainly depend on human activities such as vegetation removal, grazing, urbanisation, poor agricultural management, and planned burning. However, the underlying mechanisms that ultimately drive the activities causing soil erosion for a particular location are less obvious. We address this issue by integrating stakeholder perceptions of socio-economic determinants of soil erosion and the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE) for the Phewa watershed, Pokhara, Nepal. A RUSLE model was applied to estimate the soil erosion status of the watershed based on socioeconomic-topographical factors. The output of the model indicated that the current annual rate of soil erosion in the Phewa watershed varies from 0 to 206.8 t ha −1 year −1 , with a mean annual soil loss rate of 14.7 t ha −1 year −1 . We used a structured questionnaire to collect socio-economic variables related to soil erosion in the watershed. Bivariate correlation and stepwise multiple regression analyses revealed ten socio-economic variables that were predictors of soil erosion. The analysis generated five predictive models: the first (R 2 = 0.65), second (R 2 = 0.71), third (R 2 = 0.79), and fourth model (R 2 = 0.85) significantly (p > 0.01) explained the variability of soil erosion rate across the watershed, while the fifth (full) model significantly (p > 0.01) explained 89 % of the variability of soil erosion rate (R 2 = 0.89). Our study identified socio-economic variables such as household size, farm labour availability, level of education, conservation cost, training, membership of organisation committees, distance, farm size, migration, and farm income as predictor variables of soil erosion. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Keywords: Socio-economic variables (or determinants); Soil conservation; Multiple regression analysis; RUSLE (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (12)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11069-014-1321-2 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:75:y:2015:i:1:p:321-342

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11069

DOI: 10.1007/s11069-014-1321-2

Access Statistics for this article

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards is currently edited by Thomas Glade, Tad S. Murty and Vladimír Schenk

More articles in Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards from Springer, International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().