EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Forest–water dynamics within a mountainous catchment in Austria

Elisabeth Pötzelsberger () and Hubert Hasenauer

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, 2015, vol. 77, issue 2, 625-644

Abstract: In this study, we assessed the role of forests in the local water budget within a 7.3 km 2 catchment that has measured river runoff and a long history of forest exploitation and disastrous flooding and debris flow events. Forests retain and absorb water from turning into runoff which is a possible trigger for catastrophic events. Forest water budgets (i.e. interception, transpiration, evaporation, sublimation, soil water storage and outflow) interact with ecosystem processes that are related to the carbon, nutrient and energy cycles and consequently affect forest growth rates. Therefore, we employed a biogeochemical–mechanistic ecosystem model, Biome-BGC, as a diagnostic tool to evaluate the dynamic relationships between key forest ecosystem characteristics and the water cycle. Our study was conducted in the Schmittental catchment with about 70 % forest coverage, situated in the Greywacke Zone of the Austrian Alps. Using stand and site information from 21 Norway spruce stands from the region and 29 years of total catchment runoff data for model validation, we demonstrated that the process-based ecosystem model mimics the interaction of forest growth and the water budget realistically. The weekly catchment runoff calculations based on Biome-BGC grid simulations compared well with observed runoff data. The analysis of the forest–water dynamics/relations showed that the water budget is affected by the size of the canopy and the physiological canopy behaviour in response to daily weather. The results suggested that for fully stocked stands and with a standing volume of >250 m 3 ha −1 , forest water outflow was minimised. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Keywords: Norway spruce; Ecosystem modelling; Water budget; Catchment runoff (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11069-015-1609-x (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:77:y:2015:i:2:p:625-644

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11069

DOI: 10.1007/s11069-015-1609-x

Access Statistics for this article

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards is currently edited by Thomas Glade, Tad S. Murty and Vladimír Schenk

More articles in Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards from Springer, International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:77:y:2015:i:2:p:625-644