Assessment of a flash flood event using different precipitation datasets

Ismail Yucel ()

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, 2015, vol. 79, issue 3, 1889-1911

Abstract: Remotely sensed precipitation estimates and regional atmospheric model precipitation forecasts provide rainfall data at high spatial and temporal resolutions and can therefore be potentially used for hydrological applications for flash flood forecasting and warning. This study investigates the performance of the rainfall products obtained from weather radar, the Hydro-Estimator (HE) algorithm of NOAA/NESDIS and the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model, and their use in the Hydrologic Engineering Center’s Hydrological Modeling System to simulate the catastrophic flood events that occurred in the Ayamama Basin in Istanbul, Turkey during 7–12 September 2009. The precipitation estimates at 4 km were evaluated against gridded precipitation obtained from 34 rain gauges in the study area. The HE, WRF, and radar precipitation showed capabilities in capturing the timing of the flood events and, to some degree, the spatial distribution. They all, however, underestimated the magnitude of the heavy rainfall which caused the flooding. Among these products, the HE showed the best performance, yielding the lowest bias and root mean squared error. Correlations for radar and HE precipitation were close to each other and substantially greater than that of the WRF model. Traces of flood water available for a portion of the Ayamama basin showed that the 9 September flood event is categorized as an event greater than the 500-year return period, with peak discharge of 253.8 m 3 /s. Among the flood hydrographs produced using radar, WRF, HE, and rain gauge precipitation inputs, only the gauge-based precipitation produced a flood peak (264.7 m 3 /s) greater than the 500-year return period on the morning of 9 September 2009. The HE precipitation produced a 100-year flood value (160 m 3 /s), while radar and WRF precipitation both yielded a 25-year flood value (150 m 3 /s) on the flood day. Given the poor drainage capacity of the Ayamama basin, however, this 25-year peak discharge value is also capable of causing flooding in the area. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Keywords: Satellite rainfall; Radar; NWP; Hydrological model; Flash flood; Turkey (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11069-015-1938-9 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:79:y:2015:i:3:p:1889-1911

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11069

DOI: 10.1007/s11069-015-1938-9

Access Statistics for this article

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards is currently edited by Thomas Glade, Tad S. Murty and Vladimír Schenk

More articles in Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards from Springer, International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().