Probabilistic seismic hazard map of Papua New Guinea

Hadi Ghasemi (), Chris McKee, Mark Leonard, Phil Cummins, Mathew Moihoi, Spiliopoulos Spiro, Felix Taranu and Eric Buri
Additional contact information
Hadi Ghasemi: Geoscience Australia
Chris McKee: Port Moresby Geophysical Observatory
Mark Leonard: Geoscience Australia
Phil Cummins: Geoscience Australia
Mathew Moihoi: Port Moresby Geophysical Observatory
Spiliopoulos Spiro: Geoscience Australia
Felix Taranu: Port Moresby Geophysical Observatory
Eric Buri: Port Moresby Geophysical Observatory

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, 2016, vol. 81, issue 2, No 16, 1003-1025

Abstract: Abstract We developed a probabilistic seismic hazard map of Papua New Guinea expressed in terms of peak ground acceleration with return period of 475 years. The calculations were performed for bedrock site conditions (Vs30 = 760 m/s). A logic-tree framework was applied to include epistemic uncertainty in the seismic source as well as ground motion modelling processes. Two seismic source models were developed using area source zones and smoothed seismicity, respectively. Based on available geological and seismological data, defined seismic sources were classified into four different tectonic environments. For each of the tectonic regimes three ground motion prediction equations were selected and used to estimate the ground motions at a grid of sites with spacing of 0.1° in latitude and longitude. Results show a high level of hazard in the coastal areas of Huon Peninsula and New Britain–Bougainville regions and a relatively low level of hazard in the southwestern part of Papua New Guinea. Seismic hazard disaggregation results show that in the Huon Peninsula region high seismic hazard is caused by modelled frequent moderate to large earthquakes occurring on the Ramu-Markham Fault Zone. In the New Britain–Bougainville region the distance to the subduction zone associated with the New Britain Trench mainly controls the calculated level of hazard. It is also shown that the estimated level of peak ground acceleration is very sensitive to the selection of ground motion prediction equations. Overall our results differ significantly from those of previous studies, and we surmise that these differences are due to our use of modern ground motion prediction equations and earthquake source information.

Keywords: Papua New Guinea; Seismic hazard assessment; Peak ground acceleration (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-015-2117-8 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:81:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-015-2117-8

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11069

DOI: 10.1007/s11069-015-2117-8

Access Statistics for this article

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards is currently edited by Thomas Glade, Tad S. Murty and Vladimír Schenk

More articles in Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards from Springer, International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().