A GIS-based flood susceptibility assessment and its mapping in Iran: a comparison between frequency ratio and weights-of-evidence bivariate statistical models with multi-criteria decision-making technique

Khabat Khosravi, Ebrahim Nohani, Edris Maroufinia and Hamid Reza Pourghasemi ()
Additional contact information
Khabat Khosravi: Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University
Ebrahim Nohani: Islamic Azad University
Edris Maroufinia: Islamic Azad University
Hamid Reza Pourghasemi: Shiraz University

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, 2016, vol. 83, issue 2, No 9, 947-987

Abstract: Abstract Flood is one of the most prevalent natural disasters that frequently occur in the northern part of Iran reported in hot spots of flood occurrences. The main aim of the current study was to prepare flood susceptibility maps using four models, namely frequency ratio (FR), weights-of-evidence (WofE), analytical hierarchy process (AHP), and ensemble of frequency ratio with AHP (FR-AHP), and to compare them at Haraz Watershed in Mazandaran Province, Iran. A total of 211 flood locations were prepared in GIS environment, of which 151 locations were randomly selected for modeling and the remaining 60 locations were used for validation aims. In the next step, 10 flood-conditioning factors were prepared including slope angle, plan curvature, elevation, topographic wetness index, stream power index, rainfall, distance from river, geology, landuse, and normalized difference vegetation index. The receiver operating characteristic curve and the area under the curve (AUC) were created for different flood susceptibility maps. Validation of results showed that AUC values for success rate in training data set, for FR, WofE, AHP, and FR-AHP, were 97.07, 98.96, 95.91, and 86.19 % with prediction rates of 0.9657 (96.57 %), 0.9596 (95.96 %), 0.9492 (94.92 %), and 0.8469 (84.69 %), respectively. Moreover, the results showed that the frequency ratio model had the highest AUC in comparison with other models. Generally, the four models show a reasonable accuracy in flood-susceptible areas. The results of this study can be useful for managers, researchers, and planners to manage the susceptible areas to flood and reduce damages.

Keywords: Flood susceptibility; Frequency ratio (FR); Weights-of-evidence (WofE); Analytical hierarchy process (AHP); GIS; Iran (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (20)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-016-2357-2 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:83:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-016-2357-2

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11069

DOI: 10.1007/s11069-016-2357-2

Access Statistics for this article

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards is currently edited by Thomas Glade, Tad S. Murty and Vladimír Schenk

More articles in Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards from Springer, International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().