Comparison of simplified physically based dam breach models

Qiming Zhong (), Weiming Wu (), Shengshui Chen () and Meng Wang ()
Additional contact information
Qiming Zhong: Key Laboratory of Failure Mechanism and Safety Control Techniques of Earth-rock Dam of the Ministry of Water Resources
Weiming Wu: Clarkson University
Shengshui Chen: Key Laboratory of Failure Mechanism and Safety Control Techniques of Earth-rock Dam of the Ministry of Water Resources
Meng Wang: Clarkson University

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, 2016, vol. 84, issue 2, No 33, 1385-1418

Abstract: Abstract Three simplified physically based earthen embankment breach models, NWS BREACH (Revision 1), HR BREACH (Version 4.1) and DLBreach, are used to calculate the breaching of twelve dams, and the results are compared against the measured data and the predictions by three parametric breach models. It is found that NWS BREACH may have large errors for cohesive embankments, since it uses a noncohesive sediment transport model and does not consider headcut erosion as a typical mode of cohesive dam breach. HR BREACH considers headcut and surface erosion modes and adopts various surface erosion equations for noncohesive and cohesive soils. DLBreach adopts a nonequilibrium total-load sediment transport model and headcut erosion model for noncohesive and cohesive embankment breaching, respectively. All the three physically based models can handle overtopping failure of homogeneous and composite dams, as well as piping failure. HR BREACH and DLBreach consider both one- and two-sided widening, whereas only DLBreach allows subbase erosion. The comparison shows that DLBreach has best overall performance. Sensitivity studies show that sensitivity of these three models to soil erodibility is case dependent, but overall, DLBreach and HR BREACH are more sensitive than NWS BREACH. In addition, it is demonstrated that an adequate physically based breach model can perform better and provide more detailed results than a parametric model.

Keywords: Dam breaching; Homogeneous embankment; Composite embankment; Overtopping; Piping; Noncohesive soil; Cohesive soil (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-016-2492-9 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:84:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-016-2492-9

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11069

DOI: 10.1007/s11069-016-2492-9

Access Statistics for this article

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards is currently edited by Thomas Glade, Tad S. Murty and Vladimír Schenk

More articles in Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards from Springer, International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().