Simultaneous adoption of contract farming and off-farm diversification for managing agricultural risks: the case of flue-cured Virginia tobacco in Pakistan

Wencong Lu (), Abdul Latif () and Raza Ullah
Additional contact information
Abdul Latif: Zhejiang University
Raza Ullah: University of Agriculture

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, 2017, vol. 86, issue 3, No 18, 1347-1361

Abstract: Abstract Tobacco crop is of high economic significance for Pakistan in terms of valuable foreign exchange and being a high-value cash crop. However, changes in tobacco prices, input costs, effects of new tobacco law on producers and varying in economic conditions of the country have emerged as risk elements for tobacco production. This study was, therefore, designed to identify different risks that farmers encounter during the tobacco cultivation in Pakistan and to generate ideas for managing these risks. Various factors affecting farmers’ decision for simultaneous adoption of contract farming and off-farm diversification were analyzed in present research using bivariate and multinomial probit model. The data were obtained from April to September 2015 in selected districts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan (that accounts for more than 94% of the total flue-cured tobacco production). The results suggest that socioeconomic and demographic characteristics of tobacco growers significantly affect the adoption of risk management tools. Similarly, farmers risk perception of flood, heavy rains and hailstorms, heavy winds, pest and diseases, fire in curing furnaces, drought and risk attitude of farmers are important factors that affect the utilization of agricultural risk management tools. The findings of the current study will help in better understanding farmers’ behavior under risk and as a guideline for policy makers to anticipate different risk sources related to the tobacco crop.

Keywords: Contract farming; Off-farm diversification; Bivariate probit; Multinomial probit; Risk perception; Risk attitude (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-017-2748-z Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:86:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s11069-017-2748-z

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11069

DOI: 10.1007/s11069-017-2748-z

Access Statistics for this article

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards is currently edited by Thomas Glade, Tad S. Murty and Vladimír Schenk

More articles in Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards from Springer, International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().