River basin planning: from qualitative to quantitative flood risk assessment: the case of Abruzzo Region (central Italy)

Anna Rita Scorzini () and Maurizio Leopardi ()
Additional contact information
Anna Rita Scorzini: University of L’Aquila
Maurizio Leopardi: University of L’Aquila

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, 2017, vol. 88, issue 1, No 5, 93 pages

Abstract: Abstract Flood risk assessments are becoming an essential tool for a rational decision-making in river basin planning throughout Europe. In order to comply with the prescriptions of the Floods Directive, quantitative approaches, based on the estimation of the expected annual damage as a risk indicator, should increasingly be used for flood risk mapping in addition to the traditional qualitative methods. In this paper, a comparative application of the two methodologies to the river basins of the Abruzzo Region (central Italy) was performed for evaluating their strengths and weaknesses. The analysis was limited to direct damage estimation. The results showed that qualitative mapping could not be considered a fully effective tool for the identification of appropriate flood risk management strategies due to its limits in representing the real flood risk scenarios, mainly related to the use of a coarse hazard classification. Therefore, if it could be used at the basin scale for a preliminary identification of high-risk areas, it should be integrated with a more analytical assessment of the expected losses with quantitative models. However, a sensitivity analysis on the quantitative methodology showed that the large uncertainties inherent in damage modelling (with difference factors ranging from 2 to 10) may hinder the reliability of the estimates, with possible repercussions on the results of economic appraisals. Two case studies on the implementation of flood risk reduction measures confirmed that damage model uncertainty had huge influence on the results of cost–benefit analyses, with net present values switching from negative to positive according to the selection of the damage functions and the economic values of the exposed assets.

Keywords: Flood risk; Mapping; Hazard; Flood damage; Uncertainty; Cost–benefit analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-017-2857-8 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:88:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-017-2857-8

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11069

DOI: 10.1007/s11069-017-2857-8

Access Statistics for this article

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards is currently edited by Thomas Glade, Tad S. Murty and Vladimír Schenk

More articles in Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards from Springer, International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().