Seismic damage and loss estimation for central Indo-Gangetic Plains, India

M. C. Raghucharan () and Surendra Nadh Somala ()
Additional contact information
M. C. Raghucharan: Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad
Surendra Nadh Somala: Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, 2018, vol. 94, issue 2, No 21, 883-904

Abstract: Abstract The Indo-Gangetic Plains which lies between the Himalayan mountain ranges and peninsular India is considered to be the region of great concern due to its thick sediments and proximity to the seismically most active zone of India, the Himalayan collision zone. No earthquake loss estimation studies have been taken up previously in central Indo-Gangetic Plains (CIGP) so far. The goal of this paper is to compute the social and economic loss in CIGP region which will raise the awareness of the general public, policymakers and structural engineers about seismic risk in CIGP so that necessary mitigation measures will be taken up in advance. Further, the relative contribution of six input parameters to the overall uncertainty is ascertained from sensitivity analysis. Earthquake loss estimation reveals that Allahabad district, even though demarcated as zone II in IS 1893:2002, has expected economic losses around 9–13 billion dollars and the highest number of homeless and uninhabitable dwellings. Also, model building class (MBC) MMB (mud mortar bricks with temporary roof), comprising of 16.48% of total households in CIGP region, has high collapse rate when compared to other MBCs, due to the fact that those buildings have temporary roof made of wood, bamboo, polythene, plastic, thatch, mud and others. Further, for a scenario magnitude range of Mw 7.5–8.5, the expected human casualties vary between 0.14 and 1.7 lakhs, and the economic losses vary from 18 to 140 billion dollars, respectively. These results may not be unrealistic, as the region happens to be in the seismic bypass of 1905 Kangra and 1934 Bihar–Nepal earthquakes, with an anticipated catastrophic earthquake of Mw > 8.0. The poor quality and low seismic resilience of buildings in CIGP region are the principal reasons for the corresponding huge casualties and economic losses. Finally, from the sensitivity analysis, we found that the most sensitive parameter is magnitude followed by GMPE and source location, respectively.

Keywords: Central Indo-Gangetic Plains; Earthquake loss estimation; SELENA; Earthquake mitigation; Seismic vulnerability; Sensitivity analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-018-3430-9 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:94:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-018-3430-9

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11069

DOI: 10.1007/s11069-018-3430-9

Access Statistics for this article

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards is currently edited by Thomas Glade, Tad S. Murty and Vladimír Schenk

More articles in Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards from Springer, International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().