Assessment of land subsidence susceptibility in Semnan plain (Iran): a comparison of support vector machine and weights of evidence data mining algorithms

Majid Mohammady (), Hamid Reza Pourghasemi () and Mojtaba Amiri ()
Additional contact information
Majid Mohammady: Semnan University
Hamid Reza Pourghasemi: Shiraz University
Mojtaba Amiri: Semnan University

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, 2019, vol. 99, issue 2, No 19, 971 pages

Abstract: Abstract Land subsidence is a geo-hazard that leads to slow or rapid decrease in ground level. This can result in geological, environmental, hydrogeological, and economic impacts. Land subsidence has already occurred in more than 300 plains in Iran. Semnan plain is one of the most important areas undergoing this phenomenon. In general, miscellaneous methods have been employed around the world to assess land subsidence susceptibility. In this study, support vector machine and weights of evidence Bayesian theory were applied to assess land subsidence susceptibility. In the first step, the required information on the history of subsidence in the study area was provided. Locations of the land subsidence were specified by Landsat 8 satellite images and field surveys. Twelve conditioning factors from different basic layers including topography, geology, land use, and groundwater table were considered for modeling. Spatial correlation between land subsidence locations and effective factors was calculated using weights of evidence Bayesian theory. Land subsidence susceptibility maps were created using support vector machine and weights of evidence models. ROC curve, sensitivity, specificity, Cohen’s Kappa index, and fourfold cross-validation were employed to validate the obtained land subsidence susceptibility maps. In Semnan plain, AUC for the support vector machine and weights of evidence models was 0.748 and 0.726, respectively, demonstrating that the given models hold an acceptable accuracy for land subsidence susceptibility mapping; however, the accuracy of the support vector machine is higher than that of weights of evidence model. Results of this research can help policy makers as well as environmental and urban planners.

Keywords: Land subsidence; Bayesian model; Cross-validation; Groundwater; Iran (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-019-03785-z Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:99:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-019-03785-z

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11069

DOI: 10.1007/s11069-019-03785-z

Access Statistics for this article

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards is currently edited by Thomas Glade, Tad S. Murty and Vladimír Schenk

More articles in Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards from Springer, International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().