A bargaining approach to determine common weights in DEA

I. Contreras (), S. Lozano () and M. A. Hinojosa ()
Additional contact information
I. Contreras: Pablo de Olavide University
S. Lozano: University of Seville
M. A. Hinojosa: Pablo de Olavide University

Operational Research, 2021, vol. 21, issue 3, No 28, 2201 pages

Abstract: Abstract In this paper Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is used to assess the relative efficiency of a set of decision-making units (DMUs). Each DMU is evaluated on the basis of the ratio of its weighted output (i.e. virtual output) over its weighted input (i.e. virtual input). Conventional DEA models allow each DMU to select the weighting scheme which optimizes its own evaluation. However, this total flexibility has drawbacks and in certain contexts may not be desirable. In such cases, it may be more appropriate to consider a common set of weights to benchmark and rank the alternatives using a common platform. In this paper, bargaining theory is used to determine a common set of weights in DEA. The advantage of using a bargaining approach is that the weights emerge bottom-up as the result of an agreement between the DMUs, instead of using an exogenous criterion imposed from above. The novelty of the proposed approach is that we consider two players per DMU, one whose utility function corresponds to its virtual input, and another whose utility is the negative of the virtual input. Thus, each DMU wants to choose the output weights so as to maximize its virtual output, and the input weights so as to minimize its virtual input. In this way, all DMU try to appear under the best possible light but the input and output weights are common and agreed. Models based on the Nash and the Kalai–Smorodinsky solutions are formulated and an application to a supplier selection problem is presented.

Keywords: Data envelopment analysis; Common weights; Bargaining theory; Supplier selection; 90B50; 91A80 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12351-019-00498-w Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:operea:v:21:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s12351-019-00498-w

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.springer ... search/journal/12351

DOI: 10.1007/s12351-019-00498-w

Access Statistics for this article

Operational Research is currently edited by Nikolaos F. Matsatsinis, John Psarras and Constantin Zopounidis

More articles in Operational Research from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().