EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

An improved way to handle the strength of the discordance coalition in ELECTRE multiple criteria decision methods

Eduardo Fernández (), José Rui Figueira (), Jorge Navarro (), Julio Picos () and Efrain Solares ()
Additional contact information
Eduardo Fernández: Universidad Autonoma de Coahuila
José Rui Figueira: CEG-IST, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa
Jorge Navarro: Universidad Autonoma de Sinaloa
Julio Picos: Instituto Tecnológico de Culiacán
Efrain Solares: Universidad Autonoma de Coahuila

Operational Research, 2025, vol. 25, issue 2, No 18, 18 pages

Abstract: Abstract This paper presents the results of two experiments involving real decision-makers. These experiments reveal a significant disparity between the credibility attributed by the ELECTRE III method to the outranking relation and that attributed by most surveyed decision-makers when the discordance coalition is stronger than the strict preference coalition. Such observed discrepancies challenge the conventional ELECTRE III outranking calculations. Based on this empirical evidence, we introduce a novel model for assessing the credibility index of the outranking approach. This model adjusts the original ELECTRE III formula to consider the relative importance of discordance coalition in comparison to the “weighted-size” of the strict preference coalition. This adjustment is operationalized through a simple piecewise increasing function, dependent on the “weighted-sizes” of both discordance and strict preference coalitions. Our proposed model not only upholds various consistency properties but also aligns with ELECTRE TRI methods and accommodates other adaptations of ELECTRE III designed for reinforced preferences and interactive criteria. Some simple examples illustrate the quality of the new model in the contexts of vote-based pair comparisons and multiple criteria ordinal classification.

Keywords: Multiple criteria analysis; Outranking methods; ELECTRE methods; Strength of the discordance coalition (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12351-025-00918-0 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:operea:v:25:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s12351-025-00918-0

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.springer ... search/journal/12351

DOI: 10.1007/s12351-025-00918-0

Access Statistics for this article

Operational Research is currently edited by Nikolaos F. Matsatsinis, John Psarras and Constantin Zopounidis

More articles in Operational Research from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-05-01
Handle: RePEc:spr:operea:v:25:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s12351-025-00918-0