Specialists’ knowledge and cognitive stress in making pairwise comparisons

Matheus Pereira Libório (), Petr Iakovlevitch Ekel (), Patrícia Bernardes (), Luiz Flávio Autran Monteiro Gomes () and Douglas Alexandre Gomes Vieira ()
Additional contact information
Matheus Pereira Libório: Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais
Petr Iakovlevitch Ekel: Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais
Patrícia Bernardes: Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais
Luiz Flávio Autran Monteiro Gomes: Ibmec University Center
Douglas Alexandre Gomes Vieira: Enacom Handcrafted Technologies

OPSEARCH, 2024, vol. 61, issue 1, No 3, 70 pages

Abstract: Abstract There is no lack of studies dealing with the consistency of evaluations performed by pairwise comparison in the decision-making literature. Mostly, these studies offer algorithms for reducing the inconsistency of evaluations and indices to measure the evaluation’s consistency degree. The focus on these two research fronts does not cover all the gaps associated with the inconsistent evaluation problem. The existing algorithms are difficult to implement and do not preserve the original evaluations since the original evaluation matrix is replaced with a new matrix. Furthermore, the inconsistency of pairwise comparison has been associated with the specialist’s bounded rationality only at the theoretical-conceptual level. This research investigates the relationship between the lack of specialist knowledge and the inconsistency of evaluations, as well as introduces an approach that ensures the evaluation’s consistency by reducing the specialist’s cognitive stress when comparing a high number of alternatives. The results reveal that the specialist’s limited knowledge about the topic does not impact the degree of consistency of the evaluations as expected. The evaluation’s consistency degree is 59% lower when the specialist does have no knowledge about the decision topic but has theoretical knowledge and experience in evaluating alternatives by pairwise comparison. This is a remarkable contribution with a high degree of universality and applicability because instructing decision-makers on the inconsistency problem is a cheaper, easier way to increase the evaluation’s consistency degree without altering the original information. Furthermore, the introduced approach reduces the number of evaluations and evaluation time by 8.0 and 7.8 times, respectively.

Keywords: Pairwise comparison; Matrix consistency; Preference formats; Transformation functions; Composite indicator; Group decision-making (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C02 C3 C43 C44 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12597-023-00689-2 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:opsear:v:61:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s12597-023-00689-2

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... search/journal/12597

DOI: 10.1007/s12597-023-00689-2

Access Statistics for this article

OPSEARCH is currently edited by Birendra Mandal

More articles in OPSEARCH from Springer, Operational Research Society of India
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().