Which Physicians are Affected Most by Medicaid Preferred Drug Lists for Statins and Antihypertensives?

Jonathan Ketcham and Andrew Epstein

PharmacoEconomics, 2006, vol. 24, issue 3, 27-40

Abstract: Background: To limit quickly rising prescription drug expenditures, many state Medicaid programmes have implemented preferred drug lists (PDLs) and prior authorisation (PA). Lessons from Medicaid efforts may be informative for Medicare, which started covering outpatient prescription drugs recently. Objectives: To examine how the cost of compliance with Medicaid PDLs for antihypertensives and statins varied across physicians, and to assess the effects of PDLs on physician prescribing patterns and access for Medicaid patients. Data and methods: An anonymous survey of primary care physicians and cardiologists in nine states with PDLs was conducted in December 2005 and January 2006. Survey responses were augmented with physician prescribing data, practice location characteristics, and publicly available information about state PDLs. We analysed six physician-level outcome measures: annual PDL-related costs; the proportion of Medicaid prescriptions covered by the PDL; the proportion of Medicaid prescriptions written for an alternative to a physician’s most preferred drug because of PDLs; the proportion of times no drug was prescribed to a Medicaid patient because of PDLs; whether they restricted their new Medicaid patient caseload because of PDLs; and whether they decreased the proportion of prescriptions not covered by the Medicaid PDL for non-Medicaid patients. We assessed how these outcomes varied with Medicaid caseload, physician practice size, and socioeconomic characteristics of the practice’s ZIP Code. Results: Costs from complying with Medicaid PDLs for statins and antihypertensives were greatest for physicians in solo practices with high Medicaid caseloads located in poor areas. Although all physicians’ prescribing patterns were influenced to some extent by PDLs, those with high volumes of Medicaid prescriptions were affected more. They more frequently prescribed Medicaid patients a less-preferred medication or nothing at all, and were more likely to alter their prescribing to non-Medicaid patients. Physicians with low Medicaid prescription volumes in areas with fewer minorities were more likely to limit their willingness to treat new Medicaid patients. Conclusion: The burden of Medicaid PDLs fell greatest on physicians in disadvantaged areas and their patients. Copyright Adis Data Information BV 2006

Date: 2006
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.2165/00019053-200624003-00003 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:pharme:v:24:y:2006:i:3:p:27-40

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40273

DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200624003-00003

Access Statistics for this article

PharmacoEconomics is currently edited by Timothy Wrightson and Christopher I. Carswell

More articles in PharmacoEconomics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla (sonal.shukla@springer.com) and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (indexing@springernature.com).