Aspects and Challenges of Resource Use Measurement in Health Economics: Towards a Comprehensive Measurement Framework

Luca M. M. Janssen (), Ruben M. W. A. Drost, Aggie T. G. Paulus, Kirsty Garfield, William Hollingworth, Sian Noble, Joanna C. Thorn, Irina Pokhilenko and Silvia M. A. A. Evers
Additional contact information
Luca M. M. Janssen: Maastricht University
Ruben M. W. A. Drost: Maastricht University
Aggie T. G. Paulus: Maastricht University
Kirsty Garfield: University of Bristol
William Hollingworth: University of Bristol
Sian Noble: University of Bristol
Joanna C. Thorn: University of Bristol
Irina Pokhilenko: Maastricht University
Silvia M. A. A. Evers: Maastricht University

PharmacoEconomics, 2021, vol. 39, issue 9, No 2, 983-993

Abstract: Abstract Background While the methods for conducting health economics research in general are improving, current guidelines provide limited guidance regarding resource use measurement (RUM). Consequently, a variety of methods exists, yet there is no overview of aspects to consider when deciding on the most appropriate RUM methodology. Therefore, this study aims to (1) identify and categorize existing knowledge regarding aspects of RUM, and (2) develop a framework that provides a comprehensive overview of methodological aspects regarding RUM. Methods Relevant articles were identified by enrolling a search string in six databases and handsearching the DIRUM database. Included articles were descriptively reviewed and served as input for a comprehensive framework. Health economics experts were involved during the process to establish the framework’s face validity. Results Forty articles were included in the scoping review. The RUM framework consists of four methodological RUM domains: ‘Whom to measure’, addressing whom to ask and whom to measure; ‘How to measure’, addressing the different approaches of measurement; ‘How often to measure’, addressing recall period and measurement patterns; and ‘Additional considerations’, which covers additional aspects that are essential for further refining the methodologies for measurement. Evidence retrieved from the scoping review was categorized according to these domains. Conclusion This study clustered the aspects of RUM methodology in health economics into a comprehensive framework. The results may guide health economists in their decision making regarding the selection of appropriate RUM methods and developing instruments for RUM. Furthermore, policy makers may use these findings to review study results from an evidence-based perspective.

Date: 2021
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40273-021-01048-z Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:pharme:v:39:y:2021:i:9:d:10.1007_s40273-021-01048-z

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40273

DOI: 10.1007/s40273-021-01048-z

Access Statistics for this article

PharmacoEconomics is currently edited by Timothy Wrightson and Christopher I. Carswell

More articles in PharmacoEconomics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().