EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Cost Effectiveness of Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel in the Treatment of Advanced Parkinson’s Disease in England

K. Ray Chaudhuri (), A. Simon Pickard (), Ali Alobaidi (), Yash J. Jalundhwala (), Prasanna L. Kandukuri (), Yanjun Bao (), Julia Sus (), Glynn Jones (), Christian Ridley (), Julia Oddsdottir (), Seyavash Najle-Rahim (), Matthew Madin-Warburton (), Weiwei Xu () and Anette Schrag ()
Additional contact information
K. Ray Chaudhuri: The Maurice Wohl Clinical Neuroscience Institute, King’s College London
A. Simon Pickard: University of Illinois at Chicago
Ali Alobaidi: University of Illinois at Chicago
Yash J. Jalundhwala: AbbVie Inc.
Prasanna L. Kandukuri: AbbVie Inc.
Yanjun Bao: AbbVie Inc.
Julia Sus: AbbVie Ltd
Glynn Jones: AbbVie Ltd
Christian Ridley: AbbVie Ltd
Julia Oddsdottir: IQVIA
Seyavash Najle-Rahim: IQVIA
Matthew Madin-Warburton: IQVIA
Weiwei Xu: IQVIA
Anette Schrag: UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London

PharmacoEconomics, 2022, vol. 40, issue 5, No 6, 559-574

Abstract: Abstract Background Parkinson’s disease is a progressive neurodegenerative disease, which significantly impacts patients’ quality of life and is associated with high treatment and direct healthcare costs. In England, levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) is indicated for the treatment of levodopa-responsive advanced Parkinson’s disease with troublesome motor fluctuations when available combinations of medicinal products are unsatisfactory. Objective We aimed to determine the cost effectiveness of LCIG compared to the standard of care for patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease in England, using real-world data. Methods A Markov model was adapted from previous published studies, using the perspective of the English National Health System and Personal and Social Services to evaluate the cost effectiveness of LCIG compared to standard of care in patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease over a 20-year time horizon. The model comprised 25 health states, defined by a combination of the Hoehn and Yahr scale, and waking time spent in OFF-time. The base case considered an initial cohort of patients with an Hoehn and Yahr score of ≥ 3, and > 4 h OFF-time. Standard of care comprised standard oral therapies, and a proportion of patients were assumed to be treated with subcutaneous apomorphine infusion or injection in addition to oral therapies. Efficacy inputs were based on LCIG clinical trials where possible. Resource use and utility values were based on results of a large-scale observational study, and costs were derived from the latest published UK data, valued at 2017 prices. The EuroQol five-dimensions-3-level (EQ-5D-3L) instrument was used to measure utilities. Costs and quality-adjusted life-years were discounted at 3.5%. Both deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. Results Total costs and quality-adjusted life-years gained for LCIG vs standard of care were £586,832 vs £554,022, and 2.82 vs 1.43, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for LCIG compared to standard of care was £23,649/quality-adjusted life-year. Results were sensitive to the healthcare resource utilisation based on real-world data, and long-term efficacy of LCIG. Conclusions The base-case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was estimated to be within the acceptable thresholds for cost effectiveness considered for England.

Date: 2022
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40273-022-01132-y Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:pharme:v:40:y:2022:i:5:d:10.1007_s40273-022-01132-y

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40273

DOI: 10.1007/s40273-022-01132-y

Access Statistics for this article

PharmacoEconomics is currently edited by Timothy Wrightson and Christopher I. Carswell

More articles in PharmacoEconomics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:40:y:2022:i:5:d:10.1007_s40273-022-01132-y