EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Best–Worst Scaling and the Prioritization of Objects in Health: A Systematic Review

Ilene L. Hollin, Jonathan Paskett, Anne L. R. Schuster, Norah L. Crossnohere and John F. P. Bridges ()
Additional contact information
Ilene L. Hollin: Temple University College of Public Health
Jonathan Paskett: The Ohio State University College of Medicine
Anne L. R. Schuster: The Ohio State University College of Medicine
Norah L. Crossnohere: The Ohio State University College of Medicine
John F. P. Bridges: The Ohio State University College of Medicine

PharmacoEconomics, 2022, vol. 40, issue 9, No 4, 883-899

Abstract: Abstract Background and Objective Best–worst scaling is a theory-driven method that can be used to prioritize objects in health. We sought to characterize all studies of best–worst scaling to prioritize objects in health, to assess trends of using best–worst scaling in prioritization over time, and to assess the relationship between a legacy measure of quality (PREFS) and a novel assessment of subjective quality and policy relevance. Methods A systematic review identified studies published through to the end of 2021 that applied best–worst scaling to study priorities in health (PROSPERO CRD42020209745), updating a prior review published in 2016. The PubMed, EBSCOhost, Embase, Scopus, APA PsychInfo, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were used and were supplemented by a hand search. Data describing the application, development, design, administration/analysis, quality, and policy relevance were summarized and we tested for trends by comparing articles before and after 1 January, 2017. Multivariate statistics were then used to assess the relationships between PREFS, subjective quality, policy relevance, and other possible indicators. Results From a total of 2826 unique papers identified, 165 best–worst scaling studies were included in this review. Applications of best–worst scaling to study priorities in health have continued to grow (p

Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40273-022-01167-1 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:pharme:v:40:y:2022:i:9:d:10.1007_s40273-022-01167-1

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40273

DOI: 10.1007/s40273-022-01167-1

Access Statistics for this article

PharmacoEconomics is currently edited by Timothy Wrightson and Christopher I. Carswell

More articles in PharmacoEconomics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:40:y:2022:i:9:d:10.1007_s40273-022-01167-1