Cost Effectiveness of Zanubrutinib Versus Ibrutinib in Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Dong-Won Kang,
Li Wang,
Nicholas J. Short,
Alessandra Ferrajoli,
Yucai Wang,
Shouhao Zhou and
Chan Shen ()
Additional contact information
Dong-Won Kang: Penn State College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University
Li Wang: Penn State College of Medicine
Nicholas J. Short: University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Alessandra Ferrajoli: University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Yucai Wang: Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
Shouhao Zhou: Penn State College of Medicine
Chan Shen: Penn State College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University
PharmacoEconomics, 2024, vol. 42, issue 4, No 4, 409-418
Abstract:
Abstract Background While the efficacy and safety of zanubrutinib have been established in relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia, the evidence on cost effectiveness is still lacking. Objective We aimed to evaluate the cost effectiveness of zanubrutinib versus ibrutinib in relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia from the commercial payer perspective in the USA. Methods A partitioned survival model was developed based on survival curves from the phase III ALPINE trial. We reconstructed patient-level data for each curve and conducted a parametric estimation to incorporate long-term clinical outcomes and treatment costs into the model. Medical costs and utilities were obtained from public data and previous cost-effectiveness studies. A discount rate of 3.0% per annum was applied and costs were adjusted to 2023 US dollars. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated by dividing the incremental costs of zanubrutinib over ibrutinib by the incremental life-years or quality-adjusted life-years. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to examine the robustness of the results. Results Over a 10-year analysis period, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of zanubrutinib versus ibrutinib was $91,260 per life-year gained and $120,634 per quality-adjusted life-year gained, making it cost effective within a threshold of $150,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was most sensitive to drug acquisition costs and progression-free survival distributions, and the probability of zanubrutinib being cost effective was approximately 52.8%, with a 30.0% likelihood of dominance. Conclusions Zanubrutinib is likely to be cost effective versus ibrutinib in relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia in the USA, but the high threshold should be noted. Our findings may provide a basis for pricing strategy and reimbursement decisions for zanubrutinib.
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40273-023-01346-8 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:pharme:v:42:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s40273-023-01346-8
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40273
DOI: 10.1007/s40273-023-01346-8
Access Statistics for this article
PharmacoEconomics is currently edited by Timothy Wrightson and Christopher I. Carswell
More articles in PharmacoEconomics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().