EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Economic Evaluation of Fulvestrant 500 mg Compared to Generic Aromatase Inhibitors in Patients with Advanced Breast Cancer in Sweden

Ugne Sabale (), Mattias Ekman, Daniel Thunström, Claire Telford and Christopher Livings
Additional contact information
Ugne Sabale: AstraZeneca Nordic-Baltic
Mattias Ekman: AstraZeneca Nordic-Baltic
Daniel Thunström: AstraZeneca Nordic-Baltic
Claire Telford: AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals
Christopher Livings: AstraZeneca

PharmacoEconomics - Open, 2017, vol. 1, issue 4, 279-290

Abstract: Abstract Objectives In Sweden, breast cancer (BC) represents 30% of newly diagnosed cancers and is the most common cancer in women. For hormone-dependent BC, endocrine therapies varying in efficacy and price are available. The aim of this study is to assess the cost effectiveness of fulvestrant 500 mg as a second-line hormonal therapy for postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive metastatic or locally advanced BC versus letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane in Sweden. Methods A three-state (pre-progression, post-progression, and death) partitioned-survival model was used to estimate progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) by extrapolating trial results beyond the trial period to capture costs and benefits over a lifetime perspective. The comparative effectiveness was sourced from a network meta-analysis. The evaluation was conducted from a Swedish national payer perspective; costs, resource use, and quality of life were based on published sources and expert opinion. Results Compared to anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were €33,808, €33,883, and €49,225 per QALY with incremental costs of €13,283, €14,986, and €13,862, and incremental QALYs of 0.393, 0.442, and 0.282, respectively. Incremental cost per life-year (LY) gained €21,312 (incremental LY of 0.623), €20,338 (incremental LY of 0.737), and €27,854 (incremental LY of 0.498) for respective comparators. Applying the upper and lower credible intervals for PFS/OS from the meta-analysis had the greatest effect on the ICER in the sensitivity analysis. The results were relatively stable when varying other parameters. Conclusions Our results indicate that fulvestrant 500 mg may be a cost-effective alternative to aromatase inhibitors at a threshold of €100,000/QALY.

Date: 2017
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41669-017-0031-6 Abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:1:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s41669-017-0031-6

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/adis/journal/41669

Access Statistics for this article

PharmacoEconomics - Open is currently edited by Timothy Wrightson and Christopher Carswell

More articles in PharmacoEconomics - Open from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla ().

 
Page updated 2019-05-21
Handle: RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:1:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s41669-017-0031-6