EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Remote Monitoring of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Ulcerative Colitis: A Prospective Real-World Pilot Study

Shaji Sebastian, Jenna Roberts, John Waller, Davneet Judge (), Chloe Brown, Ruth Davies and Sumesh Kachroo
Additional contact information
Shaji Sebastian: IBD Unit, Hull and East Yorkshire Hospital NHS Trust
Jenna Roberts: Adelphi Real World
John Waller: Adelphi Real World
Davneet Judge: Adelphi Real World
Chloe Brown: Merck Sharpe & Dohme Ltd
Ruth Davies: Merck Sharpe & Dohme Ltd
Sumesh Kachroo: Merck & Co., Inc

PharmacoEconomics - Open, 2019, vol. 3, issue 3, No 10, 359-365

Abstract: Abstract Introduction The 6-point version of the Mayo score relies on two patient-reported outcomes (PRO2): stool frequency and rectal bleeding. We assessed the feasibility and acceptability of remote online PRO2 reporting for golimumab-treated ulcerative colitis (UC) patients. Patients and Methods This was a UK-based, multi-centre, prospective, real-world, non-interventional pilot study. Eligible patients completed PRO2 scores at baseline and every 4 weeks over a period of 6 months. Demographics were collected at baseline and a satisfaction questionnaire was completed at study end. Each patient provided data anonymously via an online platform. Results Fifty-two patients enrolled in the study. Mean (SD) patient age was 40.8 (13.6); 52% were male. Patients provided data on a personal computer (44%), mobile phone (38%) or tablet (18%). Forty-seven (90%) patients completed the baseline questionnaire within the accepted time range. Subsequent scores were reported on time by eligible patients with a success rate of 94%, 92%, 90%, 87%, 90% and 81% at end of months 1–6, respectively. Conclusions Remote monitoring of PRO2 in UC was feasible amongst the sample tested. Of those initially willing to provide data in this way, attrition was low. Formal roll-out of this system could be used to support a more frequent assessment of UC symptoms without over-burdening the healthcare system.

Date: 2019
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41669-019-0121-8 Abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:3:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s41669-019-0121-8

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/adis/journal/41669

DOI: 10.1007/s41669-019-0121-8

Access Statistics for this article

PharmacoEconomics - Open is currently edited by Timothy Wrightson and Christopher Carswell

More articles in PharmacoEconomics - Open from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:3:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s41669-019-0121-8