EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Content Validity and Psychometric Evaluation of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Fatigue (FACIT–Fatigue) in Patients with Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis

Edward V. Loftus (), Ashwin N. Ananthakrishnan, Wan-Ju Lee, Yuri Sanchez Gonzalez, Kristina A Fitzgerald, Kori Wallace, Wen Zhou, Leighann Litcher-Kelly, Sarah B. Ollis, Sylvia Su and Silvio Danese
Additional contact information
Edward V. Loftus: Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science
Ashwin N. Ananthakrishnan: Massachusetts General Hospital
Wan-Ju Lee: AbbVie Inc
Yuri Sanchez Gonzalez: AbbVie Inc
Kristina A Fitzgerald: AbbVie Inc
Kori Wallace: AbbVie Inc
Wen Zhou: AbbVie Inc
Leighann Litcher-Kelly: Adelphi Values
Sarah B. Ollis: Adelphi Values
Sylvia Su: Adelphi Values
Silvio Danese: Humanitas University

PharmacoEconomics - Open, 2023, vol. 7, issue 5, No 10, 823-840

Abstract: Abstract Background Patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) frequently experience fatigue, although it is often overlooked in medical research and practice. Aims To explore patients’ experience of fatigue and evaluate content validity, psychometric properties, and score interpretability of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Fatigue (FACIT–Fatigue) in patients with CD or UC. Methods Concept elicitation and cognitive interviews were conducted with participants aged ≥ 15 years with moderately-to-severely active CD (N = 30) or UC (N = 33). To evaluate psychometric properties (reliability and construct validity) and interpretation of FACIT–Fatigue scores, data from two clinical trials were analyzed [ADVANCE (CD): N = 850; U-ACHIEVE (UC): 248]. Meaningful within-person change was estimated using anchor-based methods. Results Almost all interview participants reported experiencing fatigue. Over 30 unique fatigue-related impacts were reported per condition. The FACIT–Fatigue was interpretable for most patients. FACIT–Fatigue items had good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α 0.86–0.88 for CD and 0.94–0.96 for UC); the total score displayed acceptable test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients > 0.60 for CD and > 0.90 for UC). FACIT–Fatigue scores had acceptable convergent validity with similar measures. A 7–10 point improvement for CD and 4–9 point improvement for UC on the FACIT–Fatigue total score may represent meaningful improvements. Conclusions These results highlight the importance of fatigue among adolescents and adults with CD or UC and provide evidence that the FACIT–Fatigue is content valid and produces reliable, valid, and interpretable scores in these populations. Care should be taken if using the questionnaire with adolescents who may be less familiar with the word “fatigue.” Clinical trial registration numbers NCT03105128 (date of registration: 4 April 2017) and NCT02819635 (date of registration: 28 June 2016).

Date: 2023
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41669-023-00419-w Abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:7:y:2023:i:5:d:10.1007_s41669-023-00419-w

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/adis/journal/41669

DOI: 10.1007/s41669-023-00419-w

Access Statistics for this article

PharmacoEconomics - Open is currently edited by Timothy Wrightson and Christopher Carswell

More articles in PharmacoEconomics - Open from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:7:y:2023:i:5:d:10.1007_s41669-023-00419-w