Do We Understand Unmet Need? A Proposal to Use Length-Of-Life Equivalent (LOLE) as a Patient-Centric Measure of Unmet Need
Kevin Marsh (),
Robert F. Reynolds,
Linda Nelsen,
Stephen Watt,
Omar A. Escontrías and
Brett Hauber
Additional contact information
Kevin Marsh: Evidera
Robert F. Reynolds: GSK
Linda Nelsen: GSK
Stephen Watt: Pfizer
Omar A. Escontrías: National Health Council
Brett Hauber: Pfizer
PharmacoEconomics - Open, 2025, vol. 9, issue 3, No 2, 350 pages
Abstract:
Abstract Many decision-makers have emphasized the importance of leveraging patient experience data to measure unmet need. However, there is no standardized, patient-centric unmet need measure that formalizes how the value judgements inherent in such a measure should be made. Several initiatives have identified measuring unmet need as one of the primary uses of patient preference data. After reviewing how decision-makers define unmet need, this paper proposes that a thresholding method could be used to generate a standardized, patient-centric, disease-agnostic, quantitative unmet need estimate, length of life equivalent (LOLE). LOLE would address some of the limitations of current methods, including facilitating capture of the impact of disease beyond health-related quality of life, and being more sensitive to the impact of a disease on patients. However, the acceptability of LOLE raises questions for decision-makers, including: Is length of life equivalence the best common metric in which to express unmet need? Is it appropriate to rate a disease as having no unmet need if patients are unwilling to trade off life expectancy for improvements in their quality of life? Can LOLE be estimated for more complex disease profiles? Is thresholding the appropriate method to use to estimate LOLE? How should LOLE be integrated into decision-making, including the level of LOLE that defines different levels of unmet need? Further work could usefully address these questions with decision-makers.
Date: 2025
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41669-025-00560-8 Abstract (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:9:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s41669-025-00560-8
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/adis/journal/41669
DOI: 10.1007/s41669-025-00560-8
Access Statistics for this article
PharmacoEconomics - Open is currently edited by Timothy Wrightson and Christopher Carswell
More articles in PharmacoEconomics - Open from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().