The best way to conduct intervention research: methodological considerations
Thomas Eri ()
Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 2013, vol. 47, issue 5, 2459-2472
Abstract:
This article is a theoretical contribution to the debate about which qualitative intervention methodology is best suited to building stronger partnerships between researchers and practitioners in educational research. In the first part of this article, two types of intervention methodologies gaining impact in the field are contrasted in light of Yrjö Engeström’s criticism. This discussion lays the groundwork for the main claim in the second part of this article that dialogical work between researchers and practitioners focusing on ‘contradictions’ and the ‘object of activity,’ can provide analytical tools to improve understanding of challenges in intervention research. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2013
Keywords: Intervention research; Qualitative methodology; Educational design research; Change laboratory; Activity theory; Contradictions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11135-012-9664-9 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:47:y:2013:i:5:p:2459-2472
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11135
DOI: 10.1007/s11135-012-9664-9
Access Statistics for this article
Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology is currently edited by Vittorio Capecchi
More articles in Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().