Targeting writing interventions to emotional processing level: a factorial experimental design

Cheryl Maddalena (), Ruth Saxey-Reese and Elizabeth Barnes

Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 2014, vol. 48, issue 6, 2939-2962

Abstract: Emotional processing (EP) from the emotional approach coping measure has been shown to moderate the effect of writing interventions. This study targeted writing interventions to EP level, with low EP participants receiving a best possible self (BPS) script and high EP participants receiving an emotional expression (EMO) script, versus a control (CTL) writing script. A factorial experimental design was used to balance the potential factors gender, spacing of interventions, and whether participants were instructed to keep or give their writing samples to the administrator. Post-test measures were taken 1 month after completion of writing. Sixty-four undergraduates (66 % female) participated. Those with high EP ( $$\hbox {EP}\,\ge \,3$$ EP ≥ 3 ) were assigned EMO or CTL; those with low EP ( $$\hbox {EP}\,\le \,3$$ EP ≤ 3 ) were assigned BPS or CTL. These targeted interventions had significantly better results than CTL for change in last month’s need based healthcare visits ( $$p=.0058$$ p = . 0058 ) and health symptoms ( $$p=.0107$$ p = . 0107 ). Analysis of health symptoms showed that only cold/flu ( $$p=.0369$$ p = . 0369 ), headaches ( $$p=.0393$$ p = . 0393 ), sinus ( $$p=.0411$$ p = . 0411 ), and diarrhea ( $$p=.0089$$ p = . 0089 ) showed a significant change. Data modeling suggests that gender, EP, intervention, and spacing were active factors contributing to change in health, and that interactions between them should also be taken into account. Analysis of the CTL intervention showed a marked worsening of health for low EP participants but a mild or negligible effect on health for high EP. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Keywords: Writing interventions; Best possible self; Emotional approach coping; Emotional processing; Factorial design; Expressive writing; Design of experiments (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11135-013-9933-2 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:48:y:2014:i:6:p:2939-2962

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11135

DOI: 10.1007/s11135-013-9933-2

Access Statistics for this article

Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology is currently edited by Vittorio Capecchi

More articles in Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().