EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

An interval fuzzy land-use allocation model (IFLAM) for Beijing in association with environmental and ecological consideration under uncertainty

Min Zhou (), Shukui Tan (), Lizao Tao (), Xiangbo Zhu () and Ghulam Akhmat

Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 2015, vol. 49, issue 6, 2269-2290

Abstract: In this study, an interval fuzzy land-use allocation method (IFLAM) is developed for the planning of urban land-use allocation system. The developed IFLAM method is based on interval parameter programming technique and fuzzy flexible programming, which could handle uncertainties expressed as interval values and fuzzy sets in the model’s left-and right-hand sides and objective function. A management problem for allocating land resources of Beijing, the capital of China, is studied to illustrate applicability of the proposed IFLAM approach. Results show that the optimized $$\lambda $$ λ values (which means the satisfaction degree of all model constraints) are in the range of [0.67, 0.89], and the corresponding system benefit is between $ [534.03, 698.75] $$\times $$ × $$10^{12}$$ 10 12 and $ [961.37, 1028.33] $$\times ~10^{12}$$ × 10 12 while the optimized urban land in the first studying period will be [71905, 77894] ha in the Function Central Zone, [35219, 39711] ha in the Function Extended Zone, [22012, 30547] ha in the New Urban Zone and [17609, 22910] ha in the Eco-Conservation Zone. Results indicate that reasonable solutions have been generated under various environmental, ecological and social conditions. They can help decision makers to identify desired alternatives for making the utmost of land resources of Beijing and for providing services for urban land management decisions; moreover, they are helpful for land managers to gain insight into the tradeoff between economic objective and eco-environment violation risk. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Keywords: Land-use allocation; Uncertainty; Interval fuzzy programming; Environment; Ecology; Beijing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11135-014-0108-6 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:49:y:2015:i:6:p:2269-2290

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11135

DOI: 10.1007/s11135-014-0108-6

Access Statistics for this article

Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology is currently edited by Vittorio Capecchi

More articles in Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:49:y:2015:i:6:p:2269-2290