Integrating corporate social responsibility and profitability into best practice selection: the case of large Taiwanese firms

Fu-Chiang Yang ()
Additional contact information
Fu-Chiang Yang: De Lin Institute of Technology

Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 2017, vol. 51, issue 4, No 4, 1493-1512

Abstract: Abstract Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is rarely incorporated into best practice selection, despite the fact that most large multi-national corporations receive heavy pressure from stakeholders to engage in CSR. In contrast with CSR, profitability is always recognized as a major element when selecting best practices (or best firms). Without incorporating CSR into best practice selection, firms with high profitability but low CSR can be identified as best practices. If requested to emulate high-profitability yet low-CSR ‘best practices’ to improve the organizational performance, firms may increase profitability but also lower their social responsibility, eventually causing an abnormality. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a powerful benchmarking tool for situations where multiple inputs and outputs need to be assessed to identify best practices and improve productivity in firms. However, simply adding the CSR measure to DEA outputs does not change the selection of best firms. Specifically, when CSR and profitability measures are pooled as DEA outputs, the conventional DEA identifies the firms with low CSR as best practices. To overcome this drawback, a new benchmarking method is proposed to select best practices with an integrated perspective of CSR and profitability. The proposed method is applied to an empirical case including 66 large firms in Taiwan and opens up a new path for future benchmarking research.

Keywords: Corporate social responsibility; Profitability; Data envelopment analysis; Benchmarking; Best practice (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-016-0348-8 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:51:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s11135-016-0348-8

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11135

DOI: 10.1007/s11135-016-0348-8

Access Statistics for this article

Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology is currently edited by Vittorio Capecchi

More articles in Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().