Do the sunk cost effect and cognitive dissonance increase risk perception? An empirical study in the context of city smog
Wei Qi (),
Xiumei Guo (),
Xia Wu (),
Dora Marinova () and
Jin Fan ()
Additional contact information
Wei Qi: University of Science and Technology of China
Xiumei Guo: Curtin University
Xia Wu: University of Science and Technology of China
Dora Marinova: Curtin University
Jin Fan: University of Science and Technology of China
Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 2018, vol. 52, issue 5, 2269-2289
Abstract City smog is an increasingly severe environmental hazard in China. People are eager for ways to protect themselves from city smog. By utilizing two laboratory experiments based on real context of city smog, this paper investigates the impacts of sunk cost and cognitive dissonance on individuals’ risk perception of city smog. In Experiment 1, the results show that the risk perception of individuals with a sunk cost is significantly higher than those without. Moreover, cognitive dissonance has a significant influence on risk perception. In Experiment 2, the results suggest that: (1) the risk perception of a consumer with a prevention focus is significantly greater than that of those with a promotion focus; (2) the risk perception of a prevention-oriented consumer with no sunk cost is similar to that of a promotion-oriented consumer with sunk cost. The study concludes with policy implications.
Keywords: City smog; Sunk cost effect; Risk perception; Regulatory focus; Cognitive dissonance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-017-0662-9 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:52:y:2018:i:5:d:10.1007_s11135-017-0662-9
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology is currently edited by Vittorio Capecchi
More articles in Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla ().