EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Randomness is problematic for social science research purposes

Merton S. Krause

Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 2019, vol. 53, issue 3, No 19, 1495-1504

Abstract: Abstract Mathematically defined random chance requires that every possible alternative sampling or assignment outcome has an equal or known probability of occurring. This is very different than haphazard chance for the outcomes of which there are no such statistical expectations. Because random chance cannot be sufficiently ensured for social science research purposes is logically arguable, what is actually relied upon must be haphazard chance. This needs to be made clear for several key aspects of social science research methodology: generalizing from samples, making treatment contrasts unbiased by unmeasured on subject dimensions, meta-analysis, interpreting comparative experiments’ residual outcome variance and so their statistical significance testing, the meaning of psychological measurement unreliability and of latent variables, and the imputation of missing data.

Keywords: Haphazard; Random; Statistically expected values; Residual outcome variance; Case sampling and assignment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-018-0824-4 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:53:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s11135-018-0824-4

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11135

DOI: 10.1007/s11135-018-0824-4

Access Statistics for this article

Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology is currently edited by Vittorio Capecchi

More articles in Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:53:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s11135-018-0824-4