The development of delinquency during adolescence: a comparison of missing data techniques revisited

Kristian Kleinke (), Jost Reinecke () and Cornelia Weins ()
Additional contact information
Kristian Kleinke: University of Siegen
Jost Reinecke: University of Bielefeld
Cornelia Weins: Ruhr-University Bochum

Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 2021, vol. 55, issue 3, No 5, 877-895

Abstract: Abstract Conclusions about the individual development of delinquent behaviours during the life-course are often made by repeatedly interviewing the same respondents (i.e. panel data). Missing data, especially unit nonresponse and panel attrition are often a problem for the analysis of panel data, as they pose a threat to the validity of statistical inferences. Multiple imputation (MI) is a standard state-of-the-art technique to address these problems. However, until very recently, MI methods to impute highly skewed, zero-inflated and repeatedly measured count data such as the count of delinquent behaviours per year, were not available. Solutions that were often applied included data transformations and rounding, so that available MI methods, usually based on the multivariate normal model, could be applied. This approach has also been used by Reinecke and Weins (Qual Quant 47(6):3319–3334, 2013), who analysed delinquency data from an adolescents’ four-wave panel. Recent missing data research, however, suggests that these “normalizing” practices could be problematic and that imputation models with implausible distributional assumptions should generally be avoided when the empirical data depart too heavily from these assumptions. In the present paper, we re-analyse the data from Reinecke and Weins (2013) using MI models, where parametric assumptions of the imputation model are compatible to the subsequent analysis model (a growth curve model for zero-inflated count data). Results show that the chance of reporting zero punishable offences decreases over time, with a turning point at around the age of 15. Likewise, the versatility of delinquent behaviours increases early on in adolescence, and decreases later (reflecting the typical age-crime curve). Boys and students from the bottom-level branch of the German educational system exhibit a higher versatility in delinquent activity. A comparison of present results with the original ones from Reinecke and Weins (2013) corroborates recommendations e.g. by Yu et al. (Stat Methods Med Res 16(3):243–258, 2007) to opt for missing data methods with fitting distributional assumptions.

Keywords: Missing data; Multiple imputation; Growth curve models; Development of delinquency; Age–crime relationship (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-020-01030-5 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:55:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s11135-020-01030-5

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11135

DOI: 10.1007/s11135-020-01030-5

Access Statistics for this article

Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology is currently edited by Vittorio Capecchi

More articles in Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().