Development of a critical appraisal tool for assessing the reporting quality of qualitative studies: a worked example

Yukiko Maeda (), Secil Caskurlu (), Kadir Kozan () and Rachael H. Kenney ()
Additional contact information
Yukiko Maeda: Purdue University
Secil Caskurlu: Michigan State University
Kadir Kozan: Purdue University
Rachael H. Kenney: Purdue University

Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 2023, vol. 57, issue 2, No 2, 1031 pages

Abstract: Abstract Conducting a critical appraisal is considered as one of the essential steps in any type of qualitative synthesis. While various appraisal tools are available in the literature, the reliability and validity of these tools tend to be limited due to inconsistencies in their conceptualizations and operationalizations. In addition, limited practical guidelines are available for researchers to develop and use these appraisal form for their own synthesis studies. Our goal for this study is to use and modify components of existing tools and work to address the concerns that have been laid out in existing research. Specifically, we set out to (a) keep detailed notes of our development of the appraisal tool over time, (b) attend to the inter-rater reliability and content validity of the appraisal tool, (c) provide a guidance on how to use the tool, and (d) produce an appraisal tool that could be used by all levels of researchers. In this paper, we explain the process we undertook to establish a reliable and valid critical appraisal tool for qualitative syntheses, share the developed 22-question critical appraisal form, and provide an example of how to use the results of a critical appraisal in a sample qualitative synthesis. The developed tool will help focus qualitative synthesis researchers’ attention on the transparency and completeness of the information reported in primary studies and thereby increase the credibility of a qualitative synthesis.

Keywords: Qualitative synthesis; Appraisal; Credibility; Trustworthiness; Systematic review (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-022-01403-y Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:57:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s11135-022-01403-y

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11135

DOI: 10.1007/s11135-022-01403-y

Access Statistics for this article

Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology is currently edited by Vittorio Capecchi

More articles in Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().