Scale reliability of alternative cultural theory survey measures
Branden B. Johnson () and
Brendon Swedlow ()
Additional contact information
Branden B. Johnson: Decision Research
Brendon Swedlow: Northern Illinois University
Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 2024, vol. 58, issue 1, No 25, 527-557
Abstract:
Abstract Grid-Group Cultural Theory (CT) has attracted significant attention across the social sciences and is increasingly being used in survey research. But the reliability of CT survey scales has mostly only been assessed using Cronbach’s alpha. Unfortunately, researchers frequently misinterpret this measure and often use the wrong or incomplete statistics to assess scale reliability. We compare the scale reliability of CT and its “cultural cognition theory” (CCT) variant as operationalized in surveys. Reviewing 73 survey studies using CT and CCT measures since 1990, we find limited application of appropriate method. CT measures, which are heterogeneous across studies, are far less reliable overall. But scales of roughly equal numbers of items are about equally reliable across CT and CCT studies. We apply recommended statistical measures to our data on both CT and CCT responses from an online national U.S. panel to illustrate a better approach to assessing scale reliability. We find that relative reliability is mixed (one CCT scale is more reliable, and one less, than the specific CT scales we used). But CT measures exhibit much better model fit in confirmatory factor analysis, a prerequisite for conducting valid reliability analyses. Thus, our literature review and survey analysis show that assessing the relative reliability of these scales is more complex than simply identifying the higher Cronbach’s alpha. Better tests of scale reliability could enhance CT survey research, and social science generally.
Keywords: Scale reliability; Culture; Cultural theory; Grid-group cultural theory; Cultural cognition theory (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-023-01653-4 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:58:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s11135-023-01653-4
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11135
DOI: 10.1007/s11135-023-01653-4
Access Statistics for this article
Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology is currently edited by Vittorio Capecchi
More articles in Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().