EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Muslim immigrants and perceived discrimination in Europe: a comparative analysis

Luigi M. Solivetti ()
Additional contact information
Luigi M. Solivetti: Sapienza University of Rome

Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 2024, vol. 58, issue 2, No 37, 1859-1879

Abstract: Abstract This article intended to compare the discrimination perceived, respectively, by Muslim and non-Muslim immigrants in Europe, and investigate its determinants. Data covered six European Social Surveys and fourteen countries. The study found that the perception of being discriminated against is much more widespread among Muslim immigrants. The paper also found vast demo-socioeconomic heterogeneities between Muslim and non-Muslim immigrants. Consequently, the hypothesis was advanced that those heterogeneities were responsible for the discrimination differential between the two groups. In order to test this hypothesis, the present study used a statistical decomposition model rather than the procedures usually employed to analyse perceived discrimination. It emerged that demo-socioeconomic dissimilarities (in age, education, unemployment, income etc.) between Muslim and non-Muslim immigrants do not explain their gap in perceived discrimination. Nor is the gap eliminated by controlling for the host country’s features, economic conditions and native hostility included. Instead, it emerged that identical individual traits—such as second generation, age, and income—are accompanied by opposite outcomes of perceived discrimination in the two groups. These divergent outcomes, in turn, are associated with deep-rooted characteristics of the immigrants’ cultural identity. These findings suggest that these characteristics can be more impactful than the immigrants’ socioeconomic status and the host country’s features and that, ultimately, immigrants’ shared in-group values play a more prominent role in the discrimination perceived by ethnic-religious groups than usually assumed by current literature.

Keywords: Discrimination; Immigration; Muslim immigrants; Second generation; Religion; Decomposition (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-023-01702-y Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:58:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s11135-023-01702-y

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11135

DOI: 10.1007/s11135-023-01702-y

Access Statistics for this article

Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology is currently edited by Vittorio Capecchi

More articles in Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:58:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s11135-023-01702-y