EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Which approach to accounting for employee stock options best reflects market pricing?

Wayne R. Landsman (), Ken V. Peasnell (), Peter F. Pope () and Shu Yeh ()
Additional contact information
Wayne R. Landsman: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Ken V. Peasnell: Lancaster University
Peter F. Pope: Lancaster University
Shu Yeh: National Taiwan University

Review of Accounting Studies, 2006, vol. 11, issue 2, No 4, 203-245

Abstract: Abstract We use a residual income valuation framework to compare equity valuation implications of four approaches to employee stock options (ESOs) accounting: APB 25 “recognize nothing”, SFAS 123 (revised) “recognize ESO expense”, FASB Exposure Draft “recognize and expense ESO asset” and “recognize ESO asset and liability”. Theoretical analysis shows only grant date recognition of an asset and liability, and subsequent marking-to-market of the liability, results in accounting numbers that capture the dilution effects of ESOs on current shareholder value. Out-of-sample equity market value prediction tests and in-sample comparisons of model explanatory power also support the “recognize ESO asset and liability” method.

Keywords: Equity valuation; Employee stock options; ESO asset and liability; ESO expense; Residual income; Mark-to-market (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G14 M41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11142-006-9008-x Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:reaccs:v:11:y:2006:i:2:d:10.1007_s11142-006-9008-x

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/accounting/journal/11142

DOI: 10.1007/s11142-006-9008-x

Access Statistics for this article

Review of Accounting Studies is currently edited by Paul Fischer

More articles in Review of Accounting Studies from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-09-13
Handle: RePEc:spr:reaccs:v:11:y:2006:i:2:d:10.1007_s11142-006-9008-x