A new measure of accounting quality
Paul Hribar (),
Todd Kravet () and
Ryan Wilson ()
Additional contact information
Paul Hribar: The University of Iowa
Todd Kravet: University of Texas at Dallas
Ryan Wilson: University of Oregon
Review of Accounting Studies, 2014, vol. 19, issue 1, No 15, 506-538
Abstract:
Abstract This study develops a measure of accounting quality based on audit fees. Adopting a neoclassical view of the audit market, we argue that unexplained audit fees should contain information about accounting quality. We find that our measure of unexplained audit fees correlates positively with other empirical measures of quality. We further show that our measure of accounting quality is incrementally predictive of fraud, restatements, and SEC comment letters, controlling for other measures of quality. Overall, we believe that the information in audit fees can be used to provide an alternative measure of a firm’s accounting quality.
Keywords: Accounting quality; Earnings management; Restatements; Fraud (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: M41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11142-013-9253-8 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:reaccs:v:19:y:2014:i:1:d:10.1007_s11142-013-9253-8
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/accounting/journal/11142
DOI: 10.1007/s11142-013-9253-8
Access Statistics for this article
Review of Accounting Studies is currently edited by Paul Fischer
More articles in Review of Accounting Studies from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().