Evaluating cross-sectional forecasting models for implied cost of capital
Kevin K. Li () and
Partha Mohanram ()
Additional contact information
Kevin K. Li: University of Toronto
Partha Mohanram: University of Toronto
Review of Accounting Studies, 2014, vol. 19, issue 3, No 6, 1152-1185
Abstract:
Abstract The computation of implied cost of capital (ICC) is constrained by the lack of analyst forecasts for half of all firms. Hou et al. (J Account Econ 53:504–526, 2012, HVZ) present a cross-sectional model to generate forecasts in order to compute ICC. However, the forecasts from the HVZ model perform worse than those from a naïve random walk model and the ICCs show anomalous correlations with risk factors. We present two parsimonious alternatives to the HVZ model: the EP model based on persistence in earnings and the RI model based on the residual income model from Feltham and Ohlson (Contemp Account Res 11:689–732, 1996). Both models outperform the HVZ model in terms of forecast bias, accuracy, earnings response coefficients, and correlations of the ICCs with future returns and risk factors. We recommend that future research use the RI model or the EP model to generate earnings forecasts.
Keywords: Earnings forecasts; Cross-sectional models; Implied cost of capital (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G12 G31 G32 M40 M41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11142-014-9282-y Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:reaccs:v:19:y:2014:i:3:d:10.1007_s11142-014-9282-y
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/accounting/journal/11142
DOI: 10.1007/s11142-014-9282-y
Access Statistics for this article
Review of Accounting Studies is currently edited by Paul Fischer
More articles in Review of Accounting Studies from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().