Consequences of adopting an expanded auditor’s report in the United Kingdom
Elizabeth Gutierrez (),
Miguel Minutti-Meza (),
Kay W. Tatum () and
Maria Vulcheva ()
Additional contact information
Elizabeth Gutierrez: Universidad de Chile
Miguel Minutti-Meza: University of Miami
Kay W. Tatum: University of Miami
Maria Vulcheva: Florida International University
Review of Accounting Studies, 2018, vol. 23, issue 4, No 9, 1543-1587
Abstract The United Kingdom has recently required an expanded auditor’s report for large public companies. We investigate whether this requirement is associated with an increase in the decision usefulness of the auditor’s report and whether it has indirect consequences on audit fees and quality. Our analyses cover four years surrounding the changes, including companies that transitioned to the new regime and companies that continued issuing the previous report’s format. We do not find evidence that the regulatory change significantly affected investors’ reaction to the release of auditors’ reports, audit fees, or audit quality. Furthermore, we do not find that variation in the expanded reports’ content has affected these outcomes. Although companies with long reports pay comparatively higher fees, the mere increase in disclosure does not affect audit fees or quality. Collectively, our evidence is consistent with the expanded auditor’s report providing little incremental information to investors.
Keywords: Auditor report; Audit opinion; Market reaction; Audit quality; Audit fees (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11142-018-9464-0 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:reaccs:v:23:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s11142-018-9464-0
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Review of Accounting Studies is currently edited by Paul Fischer
More articles in Review of Accounting Studies from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla ().