Stock-based compensation, financial analysts, and equity overvaluation
Partha Mohanram (),
Brian White () and
Wuyang Zhao ()
Additional contact information
Partha Mohanram: University of Toronto
Brian White: University of Texas at Austin
Wuyang Zhao: University of Texas at Austin
Review of Accounting Studies, 2020, vol. 25, issue 3, No 6, 1040-1077
Abstract:
Abstract Stock-based compensation (SBC) reduces the value of shareholder equity, ceteris paribus, and is a significant and growing expense for many firms. Despite its valuation implications and its growing importance, anecdotal evidence suggests that market participants ignore SBC in valuation. We first find that firms with higher SBC exhibit both higher valuation ratios and lower returns, suggesting overvaluation. This pattern is stronger for firms with larger analyst coverage, implying that the sell-side optimism is an important driver of the overvaluation. We then examine how financial analysts treat SBC in their valuation models. We find that analysts exclude more expenses in their street earnings forecasts and provide more optimistically biased target prices for firms with higher SBC. A hand-collected sample of analyst reports indicates that analysts who ignore SBC in valuation derive optimistically biased price targets, whereas analysts who treat SBC as an expense are unbiased on average. Together, our evidence indicates that market participants’ failure to account for stock-based compensation as an expense leads to the overvaluation of equity.
Keywords: Stock-based compensation; Financial analysts; Overvaluation; Non-GAAP; Free cash flow; Discounted cash flow (DCF) (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G10 G14 M4 M41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11142-020-09541-0 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:reaccs:v:25:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s11142-020-09541-0
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/accounting/journal/11142
DOI: 10.1007/s11142-020-09541-0
Access Statistics for this article
Review of Accounting Studies is currently edited by Paul Fischer
More articles in Review of Accounting Studies from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().