Earnings prediction with DuPont components and calibration by life cycle

Mark Anderson, Soonchul Hyun, Volkan Muslu and Dongning Yu ()
Additional contact information
Mark Anderson: University of Calgary
Soonchul Hyun: University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Volkan Muslu: Bauer College of Business, University of Houston
Dongning Yu: Ted Rogers School of Management, Toronto Metropolitan University (Formerly Ryerson University)

Review of Accounting Studies, 2024, vol. 29, issue 2, No 12, 1456-1490

Abstract: Abstract (Soliman, The Accounting Review 83:823–853, 2008) finds that separating return on net operating assets (RNOA) into DuPont components—profit margin and asset turnover—improves prediction of future RNOA. (Dickinson, The Accounting Review 86:1969–1994, 2011) finds that a firm’s life-cycle stage explains changes in future RNOA. (Vorst and Yohn, The Accounting Review 93:357–381, 2018) find that life-cycle calibration improves prediction more than industry grouping in prediction models that do not include the DuPont components. We unite and extend the above studies by using data updated since the early 2000s and performing out-of-sample tests. We show that the DuPont components continue to improve prediction of one-year-ahead RNOA. Industry grouping and life-cycle calibration using the components improve prediction further. The improvement by life-cycle calibration is stronger for mature companies, more R&D-intensive companies, less capital-intensive companies, and companies in less concentrated industries. Sell-side equity analysts and investors appear to initially rely more on basic prediction models than the expanded models that include DuPont components, industry grouping, and life-cycle calibration. While there is some evidence of investor surprise associated with the expanded models, hedge portfolios formed based on the expanded model predictions do not produce abnormal returns.

Keywords: DuPont analysis; Firm life-cycle; Forecasting; Analyst forecasts; Market returns (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G14 M41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11142-022-09748-3 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:reaccs:v:29:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s11142-022-09748-3

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/accounting/journal/11142

DOI: 10.1007/s11142-022-09748-3

Access Statistics for this article

Review of Accounting Studies is currently edited by Paul Fischer

More articles in Review of Accounting Studies from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().