Do sophisticated investors follow fundamental analysis strategies? Evidence from hedge funds and mutual funds

Feifei Wang (), Xuemin Sterling Yan () and Lingling Zheng ()
Additional contact information
Feifei Wang: Miami University
Xuemin Sterling Yan: Lehigh University
Lingling Zheng: Renmin University of China

Review of Accounting Studies, 2024, vol. 29, issue 2, No 4, 1097-1146

Abstract: Abstract Using fund returns and fund stockholdings, we investigate whether fund managers follow fundamental analysis strategies. We show that hedge fund and mutual fund returns tend to load negatively on the long-short returns of a comprehensive sample of fundamental strategies (i.e., accounting anomalies), suggesting that fund managers are prone to trade in the opposite direction of what fundamental strategies prescribe. The negative loadings are primarily driven by the short-leg of the anomalies, more pronounced for contrarian-like anomalies, and more prevalent among earnings quality, investment, external financing, value, and profitability-based anomalies. We show that funds with higher anomaly loadings perform significantly better. Our results suggest that fund managers, as a group, do not systematically pursue fundamental analysis strategies, perhaps due to agency concerns, but a subset of managers are skilled and profit from employing such strategies. We find similar results when examining the stockholdings of hedge funds and mutual funds. Our findings have important implications for the persistence of accounting anomalies, sophistication of institutional investors, and investment value of fundamental analysis.

Keywords: Fundamental analysis; Hedge funds; Mutual funds; Accounting anomalies (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G11 G12 G23 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11142-023-09762-z Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:reaccs:v:29:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s11142-023-09762-z

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/accounting/journal/11142

DOI: 10.1007/s11142-023-09762-z

Access Statistics for this article

Review of Accounting Studies is currently edited by Paul Fischer

More articles in Review of Accounting Studies from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().