Why did the Big Four get so large? Evidence from Australia

Colin Ferguson, Matthew Pinnuck () and Douglas J. Skinner
Additional contact information
Colin Ferguson: University of Melbourne
Matthew Pinnuck: University of Melbourne
Douglas J. Skinner: University of Chicago

Review of Accounting Studies, 2025, vol. 30, issue 3, No 8, 2508-2554

Abstract: Abstract We use a long time-series from Australia to shed light on economic factors that led to audit market concentration and the Big N. We show that increases in the size of a small number of public companies was an important factor that led to large audit firms and market concentration. We also show that emerging Big N firms made sunk cost investments, including in the ability to provide industry expertise and non-audit services, which allowed them to retain clients, differentiate, and grow. These changes occurred around the time the profession lifted restrictions on advertising, which helped facilitate differentiation, and that larger, more complex clients switched to emerging Big N firms while smaller clients switched to non-Big N firms. We do not find that increases in audit market concentration reduced competition; our results instead suggest the audit market became more competitive over time.

Keywords: Auditing; Audit market structure; Market concentration; Big Four; Big N (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: L11 L51 M21 M42 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11142-025-09871-x Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:reaccs:v:30:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11142-025-09871-x

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/accounting/journal/11142

DOI: 10.1007/s11142-025-09871-x

Access Statistics for this article

Review of Accounting Studies is currently edited by Paul Fischer

More articles in Review of Accounting Studies from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().