Evidence of Fraud, Audit Risk and Audit Liability Regimes
Evelyn Patterson () and
David Wright
Additional contact information
Evelyn Patterson: State University of New York at Buffalo
David Wright: University of Michigan Business School, University of Michigan
Review of Accounting Studies, 2003, vol. 8, issue 1, No 5, 105-131
Abstract:
Abstract We investigate the effectiveness of proportionate liability in reducing the probability of fraud and audit risk relative to joint and several liability in two strategic audit settings: one that provides conclusive evidence of fraud and one that provides inconclusive evidence of fraud. In both settings the auditor makes an audit effort choice, but in the second setting the auditor also evaluates the audit evidence. Our results show that when the auditor chooses only effort, a proportionate liability rule with large marginal liability relief decreases audit risk. However, when the auditor also evaluates the audit evidence this result no longer holds.
Keywords: legal liability regimes; strategic auditing; proportionate liability; fraud (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2003
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1023/A:1022652023592 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:reaccs:v:8:y:2003:i:1:d:10.1023_a:1022652023592
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/accounting/journal/11142
DOI: 10.1023/A:1022652023592
Access Statistics for this article
Review of Accounting Studies is currently edited by Paul Fischer
More articles in Review of Accounting Studies from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().